In a recent update shared by James K. to fill In relation to the Ripple v. SEC lawsuit, “the defendants are in a fight regarding the SEC’s responses to the defendants of the fourth set of requests for admission. The defendants will file a motion to compel and propose a briefing schedule with the court.” The specific dispute has not been identified.”
#XRPCommunity #SECGov V #Wave #XRP The parties are at war regarding the SEC’s responses to the fourth set of requests for defendant’s admission. The defendants will file a motion to compel and propose a briefing schedule to the court. The specific controversy has not been identified. pic.twitter.com/InbyEUu3s9
– James K. Filan 96k+ (Cheaters beware) (@FilanLaw) 18 May 2022
In the letter submitted to Magistrate Judge Sarah Netburn, which was written by James K. Filan, Ripple’s defendants Brad Garlinghouse and Chris Larson requested court approval for the size and schedule of a briefing for purposes of dispute relating to the SEC’s response to Ripple’s “fourth set of admissions.” Request for (RFA),” upon which the parties have reached an impasse.
So Ripple has requested the court to prepare a motion to compel. The parties have also agreed to abide by the proposed schedule and page limit presented in the letter for motion. According to the brief filed, the SEC’s letter against the defendant’s motion and the defendant’s motion shall not exceed seven and be filed within 10 business days of the motion.
The SEC is mandated to respond to Ripple’s RFA (Request for Access) on a variety of issues, ranging from XRP sales offshore to questions about fair notice defense and whether the XRP Ledger was “fully functional” when the sale took place in 2013.
The letter does not identify the specific dispute, but in late 2021, the court asked the SEC to respond to Ripple’s inquiry to establish the authenticity of a document, as well as being relevant to the fair notice defense and Ripple’s supernatural defense. instructed.
As previously reported, the SEC’s response to Ripple over the Hinman email is out today, May 18. The court also approved both parties’ motion for an extension of time to include attorney’s fees in a text-only order relating to Dr. Albert Metz’s supplementary report. , and it is now due till May 27, 2022.
Over the weekend, Ripple filed a six-page response to the SEC’s claim that the Hinman documents were protected by attorney-client privilege. In the court document, Ripple argues that emails cannot be protected by attorney-client privilege, as the SEC claims.