Craig Wright Petitions Court to Keep List of Bitcoin Addresses Sealed

Updated by Kyle Baird
In Brief
  • Craig Wright's lawyers want to court to seal all claimed Bitcoin addresses.
  • Wright's legal team appears to be trying to prevent further public embarrassment..
  • Wright's lawyers say public keys are akin to personal finance and should be kept away from the public.
  • promo

    Developing the Next-generation DAO Operating System Read Now

Craig S. Wright’s (CSW) legal team is looking to prevent further public embarrassment by asking the court not to reveal Bitcoin (BTC) addresses allegedly belonging to their client.

According to Stephen Palley, a partner at Washington-based law firm Anderson Kill, CSW’s legal team filed a motion with the court to keep Wright’s listed Bitcoin addresses secret. An excerpt from the document reads:

Dr. Wright has good cause to redact and seal the personal information that plaintiffs attached to the motion. Personal financial information is indisputably covered by the Stipulated Confidentiality Order.

CSW Hiding Bitcoin Addresses
Source: Twitter

The motion comes days after an early Bitcoin miner signed a cryptographic message using 145 addresses claimed by CSW in his ongoing legal tussle with the Kleiman estate. The unknown entity rejected Wright’s assertion of being the pseudonymous BTC creator Satoshi Nakamoto, calling CSW a ‘liar and a fraud.’

Wright’s legal team is arguing that public keys constitute personal finance and that the publication of such might cause ‘a degree of and likelihood of injury.’

Bitcoin Craig Wright

However, the Bitcoin White Paper while acknowledging the need to keep public keys anonymous also includes a proviso where anyone can ‘verify the signatures to verify the chain of ownership.’

Wright’s claim of being the Bitcoin creator is largely disputed within the crypto space. Indeed, several reports of plagiarism also continue to trail the Australian computer scientist with Charles Stuart University stating that it will investigate accusations leveled against Wright of plagiarizing his doctoral thesis.

Disclaimer

All the information contained on our website is published in good faith and for general information purposes only. Any action the reader takes upon the information found on our website is strictly at their own risk.